Author summary
99% 6 analyzed articles/videos 347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Umut Uras results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 629 hits . Analysis detected 3,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,306 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (934 of 9,195 authors). This Umut Uras is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Umut Uras
Author details
Total words: 2,306
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.9% percentile 5.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.2% 24.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 27.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst