Author summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Roush results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 751 faulty-reasoning hits from 727 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (618 of 9,487 authors). This Ty Roush is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Ty Roush
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠94%Ty Roush (selected)8%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 727
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
7.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles727 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.4%11.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 18.4%18.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 11.3%11.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos