Author summary
78% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tushar Mehta results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 2,830 hits . Analysis detected 18,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,074 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,413 of 8,706 authors). This Tushar Mehta is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Tushar Mehta
Author details
Total words: 18,074
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst