Author summary
78%7 analyzed articles/videos4,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tushar Mehta results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 2,830 hits. Analysis detected 18,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,074 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,413 of 8,706 authors). This Tushar Mehta is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Tushar Mehta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Tushar Mehta (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,074
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.7%15.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate