Author summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Troy Renck results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 728 hits . Analysis detected 6,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,814 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,779 of 9,468 authors). This Troy Renck is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Troy Renck
Author details
Total words: 6,814
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst