Author summary
66% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Warren results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,337 hits . Analysis detected 10,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,340 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,914 of 8,725 authors). This Tom Warren is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Tom Warren
Author details
Total words: 13,340
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst