Author summary
19%1 analyzed article/video227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Huizenga results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 338 faulty-reasoning hits from 908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,338 of 9,471 authors). This Tom Huizenga is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Tom Huizenga
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
76%Tom Huizenga (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 908
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles908 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos