Author summary
ā 31%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothy Frudd results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ā 97% (276 of 9,195 authors). This Timothy Frudd is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Timothy Frudd
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 97%Timothy Frudd (selected)12%
ā 100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 212
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510097.0% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 19.8%19.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.9%9.9%Politically Right Leaningā€¦Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos