Author summary
52% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Kawakami results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 886 hits . Analysis detected 8,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,738 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (7,115 of 9,471 authors). This Tim Kawakami is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Tim Kawakami
Author details
Total words: 14,738
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst