Author summary
19%2 analyzed articles/videos1,456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Mitchell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 2,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,824 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,604 of 9,471 authors). This Thomas Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Thomas Mitchell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
20%Thomas Mitchell (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,824
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos