Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Renaissance Theatre results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 972 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,100 of 9,177 authors). This The Renaissance Theatre is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. The Renaissance Theatre
Author details
Total words: 1,264
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.0% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 23.3% 23.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 23.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst