Author summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Ranger results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,241 of 8,706 authors). This The Ranger is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. The Ranger
Author details
Total words: 5,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst