Author summary
48%5 analyzed articles/videos1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Denver Post results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 978 hits. Analysis detected 3,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,122 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,178 of 9,277 authors). This The Denver Post is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
The Denver Post
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
77%The Denver Post (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,122
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.8%17.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate