Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terry Forliti results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Slippery Slope , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 681 hits . Analysis detected 6,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,504 of 9,471 authors). This Terry Forliti is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Terry Forliti
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.2% 16.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 11.3%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst