Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terri Gerstein results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 647 hits . Analysis detected 4,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,957 of 9,482 authors). This Terri Gerstein is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Terri Gerstein
Author details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst