Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 2,481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tebasum Durrani results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,763 hits . Analysis detected 7,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,087 of 9,471 authors). This Tebasum Durrani is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Tebasum Durrani
Author details
Total words: 9,924
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.8% 17.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst