Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 205 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Jabour results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 708 faulty-reasoning hits from 820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 91% (929 of 9,471 authors). This Tara Jabour is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Tara Jabour
Author details
Total words: 820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.2% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles820 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.1% 5.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.2% 10.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst