Author summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 2,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,700 of 9,471 authors). This Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval
Author details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst