Author summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos2,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sujata Gupta results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 6,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,509 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (8,645 of 9,490 authors). This Sujata Gupta is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Sujata Gupta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠9%Sujata Gupta (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,509
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.9% percentile
1.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos