Author summary
78%1 analyzed article/video871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Creque results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,613 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,117 of 9,346 authors). This Stuart Creque is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Stuart Creque
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Stuart Creque (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,613
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.3%12.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.5%8.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

A Face in the Crowd53%
American Thinker96%By Stuart Creque78%7/24/2026, 9:00:00 PM