Author summary
89%9 analyzed articles/videos9,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Radochia results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 4,893 hits. Analysis detected 45,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,342 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,422 of 9,471 authors). This Stephen Radochia is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Stephen Radochia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
54%Stephen Radochia (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 39,342
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles39.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.4%12.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.0%12.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate