Author summary
52% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Riegel results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 6,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,794 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,164 of 8,706 authors). This Stephanie Riegel is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Stephanie Riegel
Author details
Total words: 12,794
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst