Author summary
21%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacy Cowley results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 810 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,192 of 8,708 authors). This Stacy Cowley is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Stacy Cowley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
64%Stacy Cowley (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos