Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacey Zeidler results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 2,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,991 of 9,471 authors). This Stacey Zeidler is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Stacey Zeidler
Author details
Total words: 3,252
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst