Author summary
44%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Source NM Staff results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,629 of 9,471 authors). This Source NM Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Source NM Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
83%Source NM Staff (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.2%2.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos