Author summary
95%3 analyzed articles/videos3,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Tisdall results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,767 hits. Analysis detected 9,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,012 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,809 of 9,471 authors). This Simon Tisdall is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Simon Tisdall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
71%Simon Tisdall (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,012
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.1%22.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate