Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shum Preston results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 796 hits . Analysis detected 3,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,403 of 8,803 authors). This Shum Preston is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Shum Preston
Author details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.6% 26.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst