Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shuang-Ye Wu results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 835 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (7,808 of 8,521 authors). This Shuang-Ye Wu is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Shuang-Ye Wu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Shuang-Ye Wu (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,308
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751008.4% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos