Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shriya Methkupally results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 1,084 hits . Analysis detected 8,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (8,606 of 9,487 authors). This Shriya Methkupally is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Shriya Methkupally
Author details
Total words: 20,728
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst