Author summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheri Berman results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 2,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,596 of 8,907 authors). This Sheri Berman is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Sheri Berman
Author details
Total words: 4,716
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst