Author summary
36%4 analyzed articles/videos4,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelly Bradbury results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 8,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,103 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,067 of 8,854 authors). This Shelly Bradbury is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Shelly Bradbury
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
21%Shelly Bradbury (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,103
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate