Author summary
84%2 analyzed articles/videos946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shawna Thomas results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 875 hits. Analysis detected 7,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (4,078 of 9,357 authors). This Shawna Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Shawna Thomas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
57%Shawna Thomas (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,872
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.5%11.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos