Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sebastian Salicru results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 3,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,386 of 9,486 authors). This Sebastian Salicru is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Sebastian Salicru
Author details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst