Author summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Woods results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 955 hits . Analysis detected 5,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,004 of 9,338 authors). This Sean Woods is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Sean Woods
Author details
Total words: 5,728
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst