Author summary
ā 64% 1 analyzed article/video 730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Tucker results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 808 hits . Analysis detected 2,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (1,272 of 9,471 authors). This Scott Tucker is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Scott Tucker
Author details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.6% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 27.7% 27.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 27.7%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst