Author summary
84% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Greenstone results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 4,663 hits . Analysis detected 29,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,704 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,775 of 9,277 authors). This Scott Greenstone is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Scott Greenstone
Author details
Total words: 26,704
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst