Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 2,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saul Levin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 967 hits . Analysis detected 6,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,492 of 9,471 authors). This Saul Levin is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Saul Levin
Author details
Total words: 10,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst