Author summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sasha Rogelberg results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 7,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,800 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (4,066 of 9,445 authors). This Sasha Rogelberg is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Sasha Rogelberg
Author details
Total words: 8,800
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst