Author summary
59% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Rumpf results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,495 hits . Analysis detected 11,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,812 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,150 of 8,927 authors). This Sarah Rumpf is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Sarah Rumpf
Author details
Total words: 13,812
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst