Author summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Ravani results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 677 hits . Analysis detected 5,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,789 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah Ravani is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Sarah Ravani
Author details
Total words: 7,148
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst