Author summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 1,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Libby results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 411 hits . Analysis detected 3,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (3,876 of 8,706 authors). This Sara Libby is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Sara Libby
Author details
Total words: 4,230
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst