Author summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hossaini results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 777 hits . Analysis detected 4,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,247 of 9,471 authors). This Sara Hossaini is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Sara Hossaini
Author details
Total words: 8,272
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst