Author summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 1,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Michaels results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 470 hits . Analysis detected 3,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,081 of 8,958 authors). This Samantha Michaels is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Samantha Michaels
Author details
Total words: 7,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst