Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Skove results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 3,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,017 of 9,471 authors). This Sam Skove is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Sam Skove
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠90%Sam Skove (selected)6%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,288
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.5%20.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.4%11.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos