Author summary
91%2 analyzed articles/videos3,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Kahn results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 3,010 hits. Analysis detected 15,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,838 of 9,516 authors). This Sam Kahn is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Sam Kahn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Sam Kahn (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,784
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos