Author summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Kahn results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 3,010 hits . Analysis detected 15,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,838 of 9,516 authors). This Sam Kahn is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Sam Kahn
Author details
Total words: 15,784
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.1% 19.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst