Author summary
97%1 analyzed article/video338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sally Freels results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,118 of 9,471 authors). This Sally Freels is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Sally Freels
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
89%Sally Freels (selected)6%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 24.1%24.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 10.7%10.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 24.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos