Author summary
37% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sage Alexander results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,313 hits . Analysis detected 11,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,776 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,565 of 9,471 authors). This Sage Alexander is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Sage Alexander
Author details
Total words: 19,776
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst