Author summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sabine Beppler-Spahl results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 886 hits . Analysis detected 5,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,002 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (4,105 of 9,487 authors). This Sabine Beppler-Spahl is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Sabine Beppler-Spahl
Author details
Total words: 6,002
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst