Author summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These S. E. Cupp results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 3,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,532 of 8,706 authors). This S. E. Cupp is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. S. E. Cupp
Author details
Total words: 2,812
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.2% 24.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.2%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 17.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst