Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Sanders results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 292 hits . Analysis detected 1,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,354 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,787 of 9,471 authors). This Ryan Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Ryan Sanders
Author details
Total words: 3,354
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst