Author summary
78% 3 analyzed articles/videos 926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Canfield results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 793 hits . Analysis detected 8,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,104 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,306 of 9,195 authors). This Ryan Canfield is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Ryan Canfield
Author details
Total words: 8,104
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst